Research Formulation and Design

Detailed explanation — point by point

Foundation of any scientific or academic investigation · determines what, why, and how

1. Motivation and Objectives of Research

Motivation of Research

Main motivations:

Objectives of Research

Major objectives: gain familiarity with a phenomenon; verify existing theories; discover relationships among variables; generate new knowledge; solve practical problems; predict future outcomes.

Example: Research Topic: "Impact of social media on student performance"

Objectives: Analyze student social media usage · Study effect on academic achievement · Suggest improvement measures.

2. Research Methods vs Methodology

Research MethodsResearch Methodology
Techniques used to collect dataScience of studying methods
Practical implementationTheoretical framework
Focuses on “How”Focuses on “Why”
Example: Survey, interviewExample: Justification for choosing survey

Example: If studying customer satisfaction: Method: Questionnaire · Methodology: Explains why questionnaire is suitable.

3. Types of Research

A. Descriptive vs Analytical Research

Descriptive ResearchAnalytical Research
Describes characteristics of existing situations.
Purpose: Answer What, Where, When
Methods: Survey, observation, case studies.
Example: Surveying customer satisfaction.
Features: No variable manipulation, fact collection.
Uses existing information to evaluate and analyze.
Purpose: Answer Why and How
Example: Studying reasons for customer dissatisfaction.
Features: Critical thinking, interpretation of data.

B. Applied vs Fundamental Research

Applied ResearchFundamental (Basic) Research
Conducted to solve real-world problems.
Goal: Immediate practical application.
Example: Developing improved crop fertilizers.
Characteristics: Problem-oriented, industry-oriented.
Conducted to increase knowledge.
Goal: Theory development.
Example: Studying molecular structure.
Characteristics: Long-term benefits, expands understanding.

Concept of Applied and Basic Research Process

C. Quantitative vs Qualitative Research

Quantitative ResearchQualitative Research
Deals with numerical data.
Methods: Statistical analysis, surveys.
Example: Measuring exam scores.
Characteristics: Objective, large sample.
Deals with opinions and experiences.
Methods: Interviews, observation.
Example: Understanding student emotions.
Characteristics: Subjective, small sample.

D. Conceptual vs Empirical Research

Conceptual ResearchEmpirical Research
Based on ideas and theories.
Example: Developing economic theories.
Characteristics: No experiments, abstract thinking.
Based on observation and experiments.
Example: Testing a drug clinically.
Characteristics: Data-driven, evidence-based.

4. Criteria of Good Research

5. Defining and Formulating the Research Problem

Research Problem – a specific issue selected for investigation.
Example: Poor academic performance among students.

Steps in Problem Formulation

  1. Identify broad area – e.g. Education
  2. Narrow topic – e.g. Student performance
  3. Define variables – Independent: social media use; Dependent: academic performance
  4. Form research questions
  5. Develop objectives

6. Selecting the Research Problem

Factors to consider:

7. Necessity of Defining the Problem

Example: Poor problem definition → Wrong conclusions.

8. Importance of Literature Review in Defining a Problem

Literature Review – systematic study of previous work.

9. Literature Review – Sources

Primary Sources

  • Research articles
  • Conference papers
  • Patents
  • Experimental reports
  • Thesis

Advantages: Authentic, detailed.

Secondary Sources

  • Review papers
  • Books
  • Encyclopedias

Advantages: Easier understanding.

10. Reviews, Monograph, Patents

11. Research Databases

Examples: Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink.

12. Web as a Source of Literature

Advantages: fast access, global information. Limitations: reliability concerns, information overload.

13. Searching the Web for Research

14. Critical Literature Review

Critical review means evaluating literature, not only summarizing.

Steps:

  1. Read thoroughly
  2. Compare studies
  3. Identify strengths
  4. Identify limitations
  5. Analyze methodology
  6. Draw conclusions

Questions: What was studied? How was it studied? What were limitations?

15. Identifying Gap Areas from Literature and Research Database

Research Gap – area that previous research has not fully addressed.

Types: knowledge gap, methodological gap, population gap, theoretical gap.

Process: Collect studies → Compare findings → Identify limitations → Find unanswered questions.

Example: Previous studies: social media effects on college students. Gap: No study on rural school students.

16. Development of Working Hypothesis

Hypothesis – tentative assumption to be tested.

“Higher social media use reduces academic performance.”

Characteristics of Good Hypothesis

Steps to Develop Hypothesis

  1. Define problem
  2. Review literature
  3. Identify variables
  4. Build assumptions
  5. Form testable statement

Types of Hypothesis

Summary Flow of Research Formulation

Research Motivation Define Objective Select Problem Literature Review Identify Research Gap Develop Hypothesis Choose Methodology Collect Data Analyze Results Draw Conclusion

This entire sequence forms the Research Formulation and Research Design process.


— end of document —